In order to show it the paper invokes the doctrines of the Incarnation, the Church as the Body of Christ, and the Original Sin. The paper explores Pascal’s idea according to which the teachings of the Church assume the hiddenness of God, and, hence, there is nothing surprising in the fact of the occurrence of nonresistant nonbelief. In this study, I argue that current explanations of FET are not based on an adequate understanding of the differences between religious and scientific epistemology as such, they fail to grasp the epistemic shifts that have made it possible for this belief to thrive today. However, it is far from clear that FET is necessarily linked to any one religious doctrine or religious epistemological approach. Supporters of FET are often likened to Creationists, and the theory itself is often equated with religious claims about the natural world. Most explanations focus on the psychology of the theory’s proponents. Is FET a nostalgic attempt to revive the religious cosmology of our ancestors? Or is it simply the product of scientific illiteracy? Due to the absurdity of FET’s central propositions, serious scholarship on the topic is lacking. While it is difficult to determine how many people sincerely believe FET, its very existence-at a time when probes have been sent to every planet of our solar system-is perplexing. In addition to creating digital content in the form of websites, social media accounts, podcasts, and YouTube videos, FET supporters (or Flat Earthers) have also organized international conferences and even launched an FET-oriented dating site. The claim that the Earth is flat (Flat Earth theory, or FET) has recently become a popular, Internet-based conspiracy theory.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |